Tungsten Carbide · Nickel

90% WC, 10% Ni

  • HVOF
  • HVAF

WC-Ni is the coating you reach for when the regulation writes the spec, not the load chart. Ninety percent tungsten carbide, ten percent nickel — cobalt-free.

We spec WC-Ni (commonly WC-10Ni or WC-12Ni — Praxair's WC-724, Oerlikon's Woka 3400, peer analogues of the older LW-104) when cobalt is off the table. Food-processing surfaces under EDQM guidance. Pharmaceutical equipment whose compliance file asks about every metal on the contact surface. Medical-device components where cobalt worker-exposure is a concern. European supply chains living under REACH Annex XVII's CMR 1B cobalt entries as of 2023. In those rooms a cobalt-bound WC coating is a non-starter — WC-Ni is the drop-in answer.

Applied by HVOF on the same guns that run WC-Co. Hardness 900-1100 HV, bond strength 9,000-11,000 psi, porosity under 1%, service below 900°F. Grinds and superfinishes to mirror Ra. Better corrosion resistance than WC-12Co in dilute acids and saline.

Be honest about the trade-off. WC-Ni runs 100-300 HV softer than a cobalt-bound equivalent; on pure mechanical wear it loses to WC-CoCr. If the part isn't touching food, pharma, or an EU supply chain, usually step up to WC-10Co-4Cr. If the problem is a cobalt regulation you can't design around, this is the chemistry.

Send us the part, the service, and the compliance driver. We'll tell you which coating earns its keep.

Technical data

Hardness
900-1100 HV300 typical HVOF (cast WC-10Ni / WC-12Ni); 1100-1200 HV0.3 on optimized HVOF runs; consistently 100-300 HV softer than an equivalent WC-Co or WC-CoCr sprayed on the same gun
Bond strength
9,000-11,000 psi (62-76 MPa) typical HVOF; ~68 MPa measured on optimized WC-10Ni coupons; runs slightly below WC-Co's 76+ MPa in side-by-side tests
Max service temp
900°F
Max service temp
480°C
As-sprayed porosity
<1% (HVOF, optimized runs ~0.7-1.0%); HVAF can push below 0.5% but WC-Ni powder is less commonly qualified on HVAF than WC-Co/CoCr
Typical thickness
3-12 (75-300 µm); pump shafts and sleeves commonly run 5-10 mils finished
Surface finish (Ra)
90-120 as-sprayed; 4-8 diamond-ground; 1-2 superfinished for dynamic seal service

Where it earns its keep

  • Cobalt-free — the direct answer to REACH CMR 1B cobalt restrictions, EDQM food-contact guidance, and OSHA cobalt PELs; your procurement team can actually ship the coated part into the EU without a derogation letter
  • FDA- and pharma-friendly binder chemistry — nickel's specific release limit is well-characterized (EDQM 0.14 mg/kg), cobalt's is not; spec sheets that call out 'no cobalt' now clear compliance review without exception
  • Better corrosion resistance than WC-12Co in mildly acidic and saline environments — the nickel binder handles dilute process chemistry that strips the cobalt matrix out of WC-Co in months
  • HVOF-friendly with standard guns (DiamondJet, WokaJet, JP-5000) — a shop running WC-Co can run WC-Ni on the same equipment with parameter tuning; no new gun, no new grit-blast media
  • Grinds and superfinishes to mirror Ra (<2 µin) — compatible with the same diamond-wheel practice used for WC-Co, so sealing surfaces against elastomer seals are not a problem

Where it doesn't

  • Noticeably lower hardness than WC-Co or WC-CoCr — typically 900-1100 HV versus 1100-1400 HV for cobalt-bound equivalents; this is not the coating for heavy two-body abrasion or aggressive slurry erosion where WC-CoCr earns its keep
  • Lower bond strength than WC-Co in side-by-side HVOF tests (~68 MPa vs ~76 MPa) — adequate for most service but worth flagging on high-thickness builds or thermally cycled parts
  • Less common in North American shops — WC-Co and WC-CoCr dominate the powder inventory, so WC-10Ni / WC-12Ni can carry longer lead times and a small premium; plan the project around powder availability, not as a last-minute substitution
  • Maximum service temperature ~480°C (900°F), slightly below WC-CoCr's 500-540°C — decarburization and W₂C formation accelerate above that point; step to Cr₃C₂-NiCr for higher-temp oxidizing service
  • If the only driver is mechanical wear and no regulatory constraint applies, WC-12Co or WC-10Co-4Cr is usually the better-performing pick pound-for-pound — WC-Ni earns its spec when compliance, not pure wear, is the forcing function

Typical applications

  • Food-processing equipment — mixer shafts, conveyor components, valve internals where cobalt is restricted from food contact
  • Pharmaceutical process equipment — tablet-press tooling, granulation and milling components, API handling surfaces
  • Medical-device components where cobalt worker-exposure or patient-contact is a concern
  • Pump shafts, sleeves, and plungers in corrosive service where Cr(VI) and Co are both off-limits
  • Chemical process components in mildly acidic or saline environments
  • Crusher hammers, liners, and other moderate-abrasion wear parts in mining and minerals where regulatory pressure drives the spec
  • Hydraulic components for manufacturers with REACH-driven supply chains demanding cobalt-free substitutes

Wear modes addressed

  • Abrasive wear (two-body and three-body) — moderate-service suitability
  • Sliding / adhesive wear — competitive with WC-Co at lower loads
  • Erosion (particle and slurry)
  • Corrosion-assisted wear in mildly aggressive media
  • Fretting wear on lower-load mating surfaces

Industries

  • Food and beverage processing (cobalt-restricted contact surfaces)
  • Pharmaceutical manufacturing (API-contact and cleanroom equipment)
  • Medical device (components where cobalt exposure is a regulatory or allergen concern)
  • Chemical and process (pumps, valves, agitators in corrosive service)
  • Mining and minerals (regulatory-driven cobalt-free hard-wear parts)
  • European manufacturing (REACH-driven specifications across supply chains)

Substrates

  • Stainless steels (316L, 304, 17-4 PH — standard for food/pharma)
  • Low-alloy and medium-carbon steels (4140, 4340, 1045)
  • Nickel-base alloys (Inconel 625, 718) where thermal compatibility matters
  • Duplex stainless for marine or chloride service

Sources

Data points on this page draw on the following published references. Nothing here replaces a material-specific review by our process engineers — but it's the working starting point.

Material data on this page is provided as a general reference and can vary by lot, substrate, and application. Contact HTS to confirm the right material and specification for your specific part.

Thinking about Tungsten Carbide · Nickel for a part?

Send us the spec or a photo. We'll tell you whether this fits, or point you at a better material for the job.

Ask about this material