Tungsten Carbide · Nickel
90% WC, 10% Ni
- HVOF
- HVAF
WC-Ni is the coating you reach for when the regulation writes the spec, not the load chart. Ninety percent tungsten carbide, ten percent nickel — cobalt-free.
We spec WC-Ni (commonly WC-10Ni or WC-12Ni — Praxair's WC-724, Oerlikon's Woka 3400, peer analogues of the older LW-104) when cobalt is off the table. Food-processing surfaces under EDQM guidance. Pharmaceutical equipment whose compliance file asks about every metal on the contact surface. Medical-device components where cobalt worker-exposure is a concern. European supply chains living under REACH Annex XVII's CMR 1B cobalt entries as of 2023. In those rooms a cobalt-bound WC coating is a non-starter — WC-Ni is the drop-in answer.
Applied by HVOF on the same guns that run WC-Co. Hardness 900-1100 HV, bond strength 9,000-11,000 psi, porosity under 1%, service below 900°F. Grinds and superfinishes to mirror Ra. Better corrosion resistance than WC-12Co in dilute acids and saline.
Be honest about the trade-off. WC-Ni runs 100-300 HV softer than a cobalt-bound equivalent; on pure mechanical wear it loses to WC-CoCr. If the part isn't touching food, pharma, or an EU supply chain, usually step up to WC-10Co-4Cr. If the problem is a cobalt regulation you can't design around, this is the chemistry.
Send us the part, the service, and the compliance driver. We'll tell you which coating earns its keep.
Technical data
- Hardness
- 900-1100 HV300 typical HVOF (cast WC-10Ni / WC-12Ni); 1100-1200 HV0.3 on optimized HVOF runs; consistently 100-300 HV softer than an equivalent WC-Co or WC-CoCr sprayed on the same gun
- Bond strength
- 9,000-11,000 psi (62-76 MPa) typical HVOF; ~68 MPa measured on optimized WC-10Ni coupons; runs slightly below WC-Co's 76+ MPa in side-by-side tests
- Max service temp
- 900°F
- Max service temp
- 480°C
- As-sprayed porosity
- <1% (HVOF, optimized runs ~0.7-1.0%); HVAF can push below 0.5% but WC-Ni powder is less commonly qualified on HVAF than WC-Co/CoCr
- Typical thickness
- 3-12 (75-300 µm); pump shafts and sleeves commonly run 5-10 mils finished
- Surface finish (Ra)
- 90-120 as-sprayed; 4-8 diamond-ground; 1-2 superfinished for dynamic seal service
Where it earns its keep
- Cobalt-free — the direct answer to REACH CMR 1B cobalt restrictions, EDQM food-contact guidance, and OSHA cobalt PELs; your procurement team can actually ship the coated part into the EU without a derogation letter
- FDA- and pharma-friendly binder chemistry — nickel's specific release limit is well-characterized (EDQM 0.14 mg/kg), cobalt's is not; spec sheets that call out 'no cobalt' now clear compliance review without exception
- Better corrosion resistance than WC-12Co in mildly acidic and saline environments — the nickel binder handles dilute process chemistry that strips the cobalt matrix out of WC-Co in months
- HVOF-friendly with standard guns (DiamondJet, WokaJet, JP-5000) — a shop running WC-Co can run WC-Ni on the same equipment with parameter tuning; no new gun, no new grit-blast media
- Grinds and superfinishes to mirror Ra (<2 µin) — compatible with the same diamond-wheel practice used for WC-Co, so sealing surfaces against elastomer seals are not a problem
Where it doesn't
- Noticeably lower hardness than WC-Co or WC-CoCr — typically 900-1100 HV versus 1100-1400 HV for cobalt-bound equivalents; this is not the coating for heavy two-body abrasion or aggressive slurry erosion where WC-CoCr earns its keep
- Lower bond strength than WC-Co in side-by-side HVOF tests (~68 MPa vs ~76 MPa) — adequate for most service but worth flagging on high-thickness builds or thermally cycled parts
- Less common in North American shops — WC-Co and WC-CoCr dominate the powder inventory, so WC-10Ni / WC-12Ni can carry longer lead times and a small premium; plan the project around powder availability, not as a last-minute substitution
- Maximum service temperature ~480°C (900°F), slightly below WC-CoCr's 500-540°C — decarburization and W₂C formation accelerate above that point; step to Cr₃C₂-NiCr for higher-temp oxidizing service
- If the only driver is mechanical wear and no regulatory constraint applies, WC-12Co or WC-10Co-4Cr is usually the better-performing pick pound-for-pound — WC-Ni earns its spec when compliance, not pure wear, is the forcing function
Typical applications
- Food-processing equipment — mixer shafts, conveyor components, valve internals where cobalt is restricted from food contact
- Pharmaceutical process equipment — tablet-press tooling, granulation and milling components, API handling surfaces
- Medical-device components where cobalt worker-exposure or patient-contact is a concern
- Pump shafts, sleeves, and plungers in corrosive service where Cr(VI) and Co are both off-limits
- Chemical process components in mildly acidic or saline environments
- Crusher hammers, liners, and other moderate-abrasion wear parts in mining and minerals where regulatory pressure drives the spec
- Hydraulic components for manufacturers with REACH-driven supply chains demanding cobalt-free substitutes
Wear modes addressed
- Abrasive wear (two-body and three-body) — moderate-service suitability
- Sliding / adhesive wear — competitive with WC-Co at lower loads
- Erosion (particle and slurry)
- Corrosion-assisted wear in mildly aggressive media
- Fretting wear on lower-load mating surfaces
Industries
- Food and beverage processing (cobalt-restricted contact surfaces)
- Pharmaceutical manufacturing (API-contact and cleanroom equipment)
- Medical device (components where cobalt exposure is a regulatory or allergen concern)
- Chemical and process (pumps, valves, agitators in corrosive service)
- Mining and minerals (regulatory-driven cobalt-free hard-wear parts)
- European manufacturing (REACH-driven specifications across supply chains)
Substrates
- Stainless steels (316L, 304, 17-4 PH — standard for food/pharma)
- Low-alloy and medium-carbon steels (4140, 4340, 1045)
- Nickel-base alloys (Inconel 625, 718) where thermal compatibility matters
- Duplex stainless for marine or chloride service
Sources
Data points on this page draw on the following published references. Nothing here replaces a material-specific review by our process engineers — but it's the working starting point.
-
Astro Alloys — Praxair Tungsten Carbide Thermal Spray Powders (WC-724 / WC-10Ni)
“WC-724 / WC-724-1 (WC-10Ni): 10.0% Ni, 5.5% C, balance W; agglomerated and sintered; better corrosion protection than WC-Co; excellent low-temperature wear; superior deposition efficiency; operating temperature limit 900°F / 482°C.”
-
Characterization of WC-10Ni HVOF Coating for Carbon Steel Blade (ResearchGate)
“HVOF-sprayed WC-10Ni coatings showed microhardness ~1156 HV0.1 and bond strength to substrate of 68 MPa, with porosity of 0.74% at optimized parameters; phase composition mainly WC with small amounts of W2C and NiO.”
-
J. Thermal Spray Tech. — Advances in Thermally Sprayed WC-Based Wear-Resistant Coatings: Co-Free Binders, Processing Routes and Tribological Behavior
“Cobalt-free binders (Ni, NiCr, FeCrAl, NiAl) are replacing Co and CoCr in WC cermet coatings driven by REACH CMR classification of cobalt compounds and food/pharma regulatory pressure; Ni-bound WC delivers lower hardness (~900-1200 HV) than WC-Co (~1100-1400 HV) but superior corrosion resistance in saline and dilute acid.”
-
Surface & Coatings Technology — Cobalt-Free Metallic Binders for HVOF Thermal Sprayed Wear-Resistant Coatings
“Review of cobalt-free metallic binders (Ni, NiCr, Fe-based) for HVOF WC cermet coatings motivated by REACH Annex XVII cobalt entries and food-contact regulations; nickel-binder WC coatings retain acceptable wear performance at moderate abrasion loads while eliminating Co worker-exposure and product-contact concerns.”
-
Coatings (MDPI) — Optimisation of HVOF Spray Process Parameters to Achieve Minimum Porosity and Maximum Hardness in WC-10Ni-5Cr Coatings
“Optimized HVOF parameters for WC-10Ni-5Cr yielded dense coatings with low porosity and high microhardness; demonstrates that Ni-based binder WC cermets, with or without Cr addition, are HVOF-friendly and suitable for corrosion- and wear-resistant service.”
-
EDQM — Metals and Alloys Used in Food Contact Materials and Articles (2nd Ed., 2024)
“European technical guide sets Specific Release Limits (SRLs) for metals in food-contact surfaces; nickel SRL 0.14 mg/kg (well-characterized); cobalt flagged under separate CMR review and restricted in food-contact applications — drives cobalt-free binder selection for coated food-processing equipment.”
-
SGS — EU Revises CMR Lists Under REACH (Regulation (EU) 2023/1132)
“Cobalt metal and multiple cobalt compounds classified as CMR Category 1B under REACH Annex XVII Appendix 2; provisions effective December 1, 2023 — restricts cobalt supply into consumer-facing and food-contact applications across the EU, driving substitution to nickel binders in wear-resistant coatings.”
Material data on this page is provided as a general reference and can vary by lot, substrate, and application. Contact HTS to confirm the right material and specification for your specific part.
Thinking about Tungsten Carbide · Nickel for a part?
Send us the spec or a photo. We'll tell you whether this fits, or point you at a better material for the job.
Ask about this material