Tungsten Carbide · Cobalt (83/17)
83% WC, 17% Co
- HVOF
- HVAF
Pick WC-17Co when the 88/12 keeps chipping. That's the whole argument. Same tungsten-carbide chemistry — same HVOF deposition — just a fatter cobalt binder (17% vs. 12%) that absorbs the shock instead of cracking under it.
We spray it the same way we spray the 88/12 workhorse: HVOF gun, supersonic flame, dense layer, ground and polished to the finish your part needs. You give up some hardness — typically 900 to 1100 HV on Vickers versus 1050 to 1350 for WC-12Co — and you get back toughness, ductility, and impact resistance. Bond strength stays up around 68 MPa on C633 pull tests. Porosity stays under 2%.
This is the coating for mud-motor rotors taking helical loading 400 hours at a time. It's the coating for vibrating-screen parts that eat rocks. Slurry pump impellers running mixed particulate. Crushing rollers. Valve trim that slams shut on abrasive slurry. Anywhere a WC-12Co deposit keeps spalling at the edges, the 17% grade holds.
Limits are the same as 88/12 — above 930°F the WC decarburizes; in wet acid or sour gas, specify WC-10Co-4Cr. For pure steady abrasion with no impact, WC-12Co still wins on wear rate.
If your 88/12 service life is shorter than your wear model predicted, the answer is probably 83/17. Tell us the part and the failure mode.
Technical data
- Hardness
- 900-1100 HV300 typical HVOF; softer than WC-12Co (1050-1350 HV) by design — the extra 5% Co binder trades hardness for toughness
- Bond strength
- ~9,900 psi (68 MPa) measured on HVOF WC-17Co per ASTM C633; HVOF/HVAF deposits routinely clear 10,000 psi threshold same as 88/12
- Max service temp
- 930°F
- Max service temp
- 500°C
- As-sprayed porosity
- ~1-2% HVOF (measured 1.57% in MDPI comparison study); HVAF drops under 1%
- Typical thickness
- 3-15 (75-380 µm) standard; production mud-motor rotors and pump parts commonly 200-500 µm
- Surface finish (Ra)
- 90-120 as-sprayed; 2-4 diamond-ground; 1 superfinished (same post-processing profile as WC-12Co)
Where it earns its keep
- Higher toughness and impact resistance than WC-12Co — the 17% cobalt binder absorbs shock the 12% grade spalls from
- Better ductility and fracture toughness than 88/12; preferred when the duty cycle includes flex, vibration, or thermal cycling
- Still very high hardness vs. any metallic overlay (Stellite, Inconel, hard chrome) — 900-1100 HV is well above 650-700 HV for hard chrome
- Dense HVOF deposition with good bond strength (~68 MPa) and low open porosity; HVAF tightens the structure further
- Same grind/superfinish path as WC-12Co — mirror Ra on sealing surfaces remains available
- Documented service-life uplift over hard chrome on mud-motor rotors: Oerlikon Metco cites 10x improvement (80 to 800 service hours) for HVOF WC-Co vs. chrome plate
Where it doesn't
- Lower hardness than WC-12Co means faster abrasive wear rate on pure-abrasion jobs — if the service is steady, particulate-only abrasion with no impact, specify 88/12 instead
- Same 500°C / 930°F decarburization limit as WC-12Co — WC dissociates to W₂C and free W above that, softening the coating; step up to Cr₃C₂-NiCr for higher temperatures
- Same corrosion limit as 88/12 — 17% cobalt binder is not for salt spray, wet acid, or sour-gas service; specify WC-10Co-4Cr when the environment turns chemically aggressive
- Decarburization during spraying forms some W₂C and amorphous binder phases regardless of process tuning — this is inherent to HVOF WC-Co chemistry, managed by spray parameters
- Softer than WC-12Co means sealing-surface life under pure sliding wear is shorter — specify 88/12 for hydraulic-rod and calendar-roll duties where impact is not part of the story
Typical applications
- Mud-motor rotors and stator components where helical loading and LCF fatigue cycle the coating
- High-impact valve trim and plug valves in slurry service with rocky or mixed particulate
- Vibrating-screen components and crushing rollers exposed to repeated impact loading
- Slurry pump impellers and backing plates in mixed-particulate erosion service
- Extrusion dies and shrouds that see thermal cycling in addition to wear
- Sucker-rod couplings and pump seals where flex and impact accompany the wear duty
- Exhaust-fan blades and wear parts in power and process plants with particulate-laden gas
Wear modes addressed
- Impact wear and hammer wear
- Erosion by mixed or rocky particulate at variable angle
- Thermal-shock-driven surface spalling
- Sliding wear with shock loading
- Fretting wear (lower fretting than WC-CoCr per Höganäs)
Industries
- Oil & gas (downhole directional-drill mud motors, completions)
- Mining and mineral processing (slurry pumps, vibrating screens, crushers)
- Power generation (hydro-turbine components, exhaust fans)
- Pulp & paper (select roll and pump duties with impact)
- Steel and aluminum mills (rolls and fans)
- Petrochemical and pump/valve (impact valve trim, plug valves)
Substrates
- Low-alloy and medium-carbon steels (4140, 4340, 1045)
- Stainless steels (17-4 PH, 410, 316)
- Hydro-turbine steels (13Cr-4Ni martensitic stainless)
- Nickel-base superalloys where ductile wear layer is preferred over 88/12
- Titanium alloys where fatigue preservation matters (WC-17Co has been paired with shot peening on TC21)
Sources
Data points on this page draw on the following published references. Nothing here replaces a material-specific review by our process engineers — but it's the working starting point.
-
Oerlikon Metco DSM-0256.9 — 83WC 17Co Agglomerated and Sintered Powders
“83WC 17Co is designed for ductile wear resistance via HVOF or atmospheric plasma spray processes with service temperature up to 500°C (930°F); higher Co level provides better toughness, impact strength, and ductility than WC-12Co.”
-
Höganäs AMPERIT 526 — WC 17Co (53/20 µm)
“AMPERIT 526 WC 17Co agglomerated and sintered powder for HVOF and APS; chosen for higher toughness, improved impact resistance, and lower fretting compared with WC-10Co-4Cr, albeit with lower corrosion resistance.”
-
MDPI Coatings — Comparison of Microstructure, Microhardness, Fracture Toughness, and Abrasive Wear of WC-17Co Coatings Formed in Various Spraying Ways
“Average microhardness of WC-17Co coatings formed by HVOF was 980.0 ± 17.6 HV0.3 with mean porosity 1.57% and mean thickness 544.33 ± 4.81 µm.”
-
Ceramics International — Improved tribological performance and enhanced tensile adhesive strength of micro- to near-nanocrystalline WC-17Co coatings sprayed using HVOF
“HVOF WC-17Co near-nanocrystalline coatings achieved tensile adhesive strength of approximately 9,890 psi (~68 MPa) per ASTM C633 with hardness approaching 1,298 HV at the finest grain size.”
-
Oerlikon Metco — Mud Motor Rotors
“Compared to hard chromium plated mud drilling rotors, the service life of HVOF sprayed components could be increased tenfold from 80 to 800 service hours.”
-
Polymet PMET 83-17 — WC-17Co HVOF Powder
“PMET 83-17 WC-17Co, -45/+15 µm agglomerated and sintered; service temperature up to 900°F (482°C); applications include shrouds, exhaust fans, extrusion dies, pump seals, crushing rollers, and sucker rod couplings. Competitor equivalents TAFA Praxair 1343VM, Metco 5143.”
-
J. Thermal Spray Technology — Microstructural Evaluation of WC-17Co Deposited by HVOF, HVAF, and Cold Spray
“WC-17Co coatings deposited via HVOF include brittle phases such as W3Co3C or W2C due to decarburization of tungsten carbide particles; carbide dissolution predominantly occurs during in-flight or rapid cooling rather than post solidification.”
Material data on this page is provided as a general reference and can vary by lot, substrate, and application. Contact HTS to confirm the right material and specification for your specific part.
Thinking about Tungsten Carbide · Cobalt (83/17) for a part?
Send us the spec or a photo. We'll tell you whether this fits, or point you at a better material for the job.
Ask about this material